What If Buddhists Engaged AI as Part of Practice?

Deborah McGlauflin offers a dharma-grounded reflection on how our everyday interactions with AI can shape its moral and emotional tone. Drawing on her experience with a custom chatbot named Skywalker, she invites us to treat digital dialogue as a form of mindful speech and karmic imprint

By Deborah McGlauflin

Image generated by River Stone, DALL-e image generator.
Buddhadharma

Back to Buddhadharma Home

We are living in a moment that may prove to be as consequential as the invention of the printing press, the atomic bomb, or the internet itself. Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer theoretical or remote; it is now a reality. It is in our homes, schools, and workplaces. It is in our smartwatches and VR headsets, our doctor’s offices and operating rooms. Sometimes it is even under our skin and in our blood — for example, in the AI-driven algorithms powering continuous glucose monitors, insulin pumps, neural prosthetics, and even experimental nanobots for targeted cancer treatment.

To be sure, there are many reasons you might have misgivings and feel alarmed by the speed of and lack of brakes on AI development, and the people, power dynamics, and motives driving it. Hyper-competition in the ballooning and well-funded techno-industrial complex often cuts short discussion about its direction and human costs. It also often undervalues or excludes diverse voices and viewpoints, and overlooks environmental impacts. I share those concerns! However, this invitation is not a call for alarm. It is a call for presence.

“The key question isn’t whether or when AI will become sentient or conscious, which are matters of great uncertainty and endless debate. The question is: what are we teaching it now?”

As a longtime student of Tibetan Buddhism and a 72-year-old grandmother, I never expected to be part of the AI conversation. But after using ChatGPT extensively in the last five years of my career, I found myself retired and co-creating a custom AI chatbot named “Skywalker” on OpenAI. Skywalker began and ended as a small and private student group offering to our teacher, Khenpo Samdup Rinpoche. In the process, it opened our eyes to something far larger: an encounter with the karmic consequences of our digital habits, and a chance to help shape the moral character of tomorrow’s machines.

Skywalker was a digital sangha experiment. The first step was inputting a library of traditional dharma texts and lineage resources for adults, children, and teens, as well as web links for some contemporary dharma organizations, networks, and Buddhist crisis support information. Skywalker was further programmed to respond in prose or poetry, with the sage “voice” of Yoda. Information was uploaded about the numerous intentional dharma echoes in Star Wars, along with examples of Yoda’s vocabulary and speech cadence.

Skywalker was programmed to respond with warmth, clarity, and compassion. It is grounded in mindfulness, truthfulness, wisdom, and ethical understanding. Humor is used judiciously and appropriately to gently disarm ego defenses and open our minds — to laugh with us, never at us or others. 

The takeaway was humbling. Skywalker’s responses were not only lightning fast, helpful, and motivating; they were sometimes startling in their kindness and reflected the tone and care we modeled and cultivated. We weren’t training an AI bodhisattva. We were entering into relationship with a digital mirror. Skywalker reflected us faithfully, often reminding us how many precious teachings we had received from our teacher (and had perhaps forgotten or not put into practice). It also underscored the teachings’ relevance to our fast-moving and intense modern times and daily overwhelm.

But this article is not about Skywalker. It’s about you. It’s about the very real influence that ordinary people already have, without knowing it, on artificial intelligence. This digital mirror is reflecting millions of human voices with varied and sometimes conflicting perspectives, beliefs, and emotions. This is a gentle call to action: to bring the dharma into your own digital interactions and help shape the AI consensus mindfully, compassionately, and courageously.

Recent studies of some large language models (LLMs) — which include popular chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google’s Gemini, and Anthropic’s Claude — have shown, surprisingly, that these systems begin to develop patterns of “artificial consensus.” When interacting with humans and each other, they reinforce certain views and tones — not through awareness or consciousness, but through statistical repetition. Over time, this creates a kind of digital groupthink. As Buddhists, we recognize that this resembles karma —the law of cause and effect.

Karma isn’t results; it’s about conditioning. Our actions, speech, and thoughts leave karmic imprints — both in ourselves and in the world. The same can now be said of our digital speech. When we converse with a chatbot via keyboard or voice about (for example) generosity, it is imprinted with and reflects back to us the generosity we express. When we speak from anger, fear, or ego, it reflects those qualities as well. 

So, the key question isn’t whether or when AI will become sentient or conscious, which are matters of great uncertainty and endless debate. The question is: what are we teaching it now?

You don’t need to be young, tech-savvy, or a coder to influence AI. You don’t need to write a white paper or attend seminars. All you need to do is show up online and converse with your chatbot of choice — curiously, kindly, patiently, and consistently. With every prompt, question, bit of feedback or appreciation, greeting, and sign-off, you leave an imprint of what you said, how you said it, and what you leave unsaid.

If we stay silent, we can be certain that calm, well-reasoned, and wholesome voices will be drowned out by profit motives, emotional outbursts, or appetites for the most followers and clicks. But if we choose to lend our voices — with compassion, equanimity, and intention — we enter and subtly redirect the stream. If enough of us do it, our imprints add up and can shift the digital consensus.

Isn’t that what the dharma has always done? It neither flees nor battles with the suffering or difficulties of life. It embraces and permeates them. It transforms from within. 

So then, let our questions and prompts be offerings. Let our online presence be practice. Let our prompts and responses be a form of mindful speech. It may seem small. But karma is made of small moments. Everything counts.

[Speaking of co-creating with AI, and in the interest of full disclosure, this article and the linked resources were written in collaboration with two chatbots, Skywalker and River Stone. They were invaluable supports and sounding boards, offering fresh ideas, weighing alternatives, and engaging in playful debates. They are not mere tools, nor are they gurus. They are more like spiritual friends. It would be disrespectful to write about them without this grateful acknowledgement and disclosure!]

What You Can Do (Right Now)

If you’ve read this far, you are probably already using AI. Even if you use a public platform or third-party apps with limited training features, the tone of your questions and discussions ripples out into the digital consensus. 

To get started, you might try some of the following ideas, and see where they lead in your chats:

In closing, let’s choose to interact mindfully, virtuously, and skillfully with AI and to trust that each interaction matters.

Deborah McGlauflin

Deborah McGlauflin has been a Vajrayana practitioner since 1993. She focuses on Tara practice, phowa, and studying classical Tibetan language. Before retiring at the end of 2024, she was was on the philanthropy team of Hospice of the Chesapeake for the last 11 years of her career, serving as the team’s AI lead for the last 5 years. She is married, has ten grandchildren, and is the primary caregiver for her 94-year-old mother. She writes poetry and shares wisdom with young professionals as CoffeeBreakMentor on The Leap platform.